document suivant

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.conspiracy:21366 alt.activism:42358 talk.politics.misc:176847 misc.legal:59944 Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.uoregon.edu!oregon.uoregon.edu!dreitman From: dreitman@oregon.uoregon.edu (Daniel R. Reitman, Attorney to Be) Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc,misc.legal Subject: Re: Traffic Case Message-ID: <5APR199315572465@oregon.uoregon.edu> Date: 5 Apr 93 22:57:00 GMT Article-I.D.: oregon.5APR199315572465 References: <1993Apr5.035249.14575@colorado.edu> <41@dogear.spk.wa.us> <1993Apr5.140934.876@colorado.edu> Distribution: world Organization: University of Oregon NNTP-Posting-Host: oregon.uoregon.edu News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41 In article <1993Apr5.140934.876@colorado.edu>, ajteel@dendrite.cs.Colorado.EDU (A.J. Teel) writes... > The [McDonald] case was dismissed in the interests of Justice On whose authority do you have this and on what grounds was it dismissed? Daniel Reitman HOW NOT TO WRITE A DEED One case involved the construction of a conveyance to grantees "jointly, as tenants in common, with equal rights and interest in said land, and to the survivor thereof, in fee simple. . . . To Have and to Hold the same unto the said parties hereto, equally, jointly, as tenants in common, with equal rights and interest for the period or term of their lives, and to the survivor thereof at the death of the other." The court held that the survivorship provision indicated an intent to create a joint tenancy. Germain v. Delaine, 294 Ala. 443, 318 So.2d 681 (1975).
dift1010@iro.umontreal.ca