Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.conspiracy:21366 alt.activism:42358 talk.politics.misc:176847 misc.legal:59944
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.uoregon.edu!oregon.uoregon.edu!dreitman
From: dreitman@oregon.uoregon.edu (Daniel R. Reitman, Attorney to Be)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Traffic Case
Message-ID: <5APR199315572465@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Date: 5 Apr 93 22:57:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: oregon.5APR199315572465
References: <1993Apr5.035249.14575@colorado.edu> <41@dogear.spk.wa.us> <1993Apr5.140934.876@colorado.edu>
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Oregon
NNTP-Posting-Host: oregon.uoregon.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
In article <1993Apr5.140934.876@colorado.edu>,
ajteel@dendrite.cs.Colorado.EDU (A.J. Teel) writes...
> The [McDonald] case was dismissed in the interests of Justice
On whose authority do you have this and on what grounds was it
dismissed?
Daniel Reitman
HOW NOT TO WRITE A DEED
One case involved the construction of a conveyance to grantees "jointly, as
tenants in common, with equal rights and interest in said land, and to the
survivor thereof, in fee simple. . . . To Have and to Hold the same unto the
said parties hereto, equally, jointly, as tenants in common, with equal rights
and interest for the period or term of their lives, and to the survivor thereof
at the death of the other."
The court held that the survivorship provision indicated an intent to create a
joint tenancy. Germain v. Delaine, 294 Ala. 443, 318 So.2d 681 (1975).
dift1010@iro.umontreal.ca