aller en fin du document suivant document suivant

Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!orchid.UCSC.EDU!stephen From: stephen@orchid.UCSC.EDU () Newsgroups: ca.politics,ba.politics,talk.politics.misc Subject: A demo of Nonsense Talk- and what about all the other lies? Date: 5 Apr 1993 18:35:01 GMT Organization: Santa Cruz Distribution: usa Message-ID: <1ppu4mINNcu7@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> References: <15196@optilink.COM> NNTP-Posting-Host: orchid.ucsc.edu In article <15196@optilink.COM> cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer) writes: > >Homosexuals have been lying about the 10% number for so long that >the politicians are running scared of them. Of course, homosexuals >lying should be no surprise. > How can you lie about something that no one knows for sure. I am the first to state that the 10% figure may be too high- but it may just be too low, depending on what you are talking about. Keep in mind that there are 'practicing' heterosexuals that are actually gay. These people chose to take a road that avoids being harassed and they wanted to 'fit-in' with everyone other 'normal' person. But let's get off of this irrational behavior of calling everyone a liar, you cannot even start to support such claims. >Also, the corrupt, criminal and lying nature of Kinsey's work, which >provides much of the justification for homosexual "rights" in the modern >era, should make people step back for a moment and question the rest >of the crap that they have been force-fed by the news media. This sure sounds definitive. How do you label Kinsey's work like this, from that factually based and scientific journal WSJ? >-- >Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all. This is an interesting statement. Do you realize how many things you do your life that are not based on 'mutual consent'- and that it may be required on occasion that all parties may not be mutually consenting? This
dift1010@iro.umontreal.ca