aller en fin du document suivant document suivant

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu misc.headlines:41574 talk.politics.misc:176872 talk.politics.mideast:75374 Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ddsw1!not-for-mail From: arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast Subject: Re: NEWS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED, Mar 29 Message-ID: <1pqskq$jt2@genesis.MCS.COM> Date: 5 Apr 93 17:15:38 GMT Article-I.D.: genesis.1pqskq$jt2 References: <1p7b51$smg@genesis.MCS.COM> <1993Apr1.214856.5339@Rapnet.Sanders.Lockheed.Com> <1pkl2n$kka@genesis.MCS.COM> <1937@tecsun1.tec.army.mil> Organization: MCSNet Contributor, Chicago, IL NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.mcs.com In article <1937@tecsun1.tec.army.mil> riggs@descartes.etl.army.mil (Bill Riggs) writes: >In article <1pkl2n$kka@genesis.MCS.COM> arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes: >>In article <1993Apr1.214856.5339@Rapnet.Sanders.Lockheed.Com> babb@k2 (Scott Babb) writes: >>>Jack Schmidling (arf@genesis.MCS.COM) wrote: >>> >>>: >An Israeli soldier, stabbed in the neck, was lightly injured. Soldiers >>>: opened fire when a 19-year-old Gazan standing among visitors to the jail >>>: stabbed the soldier, who pushed the attacker away. Witnesses said up to >>>: eight soldiers fired at the man and he was hit repeatedly in the head. >>> >>>A soldier is attacked and his attacker is killed. What is the problem >>>here? Would your opinion be any different if the soldiers wounds were >>>more severe? How about if his attacker was only crippled for life, >>>instead of being killed? I suspect that any Army would reprimand >>>soldiers who shot to injure, rather than kill. Another lesson here: >> >>You are really sick, my friend. The problem is that YOU PEOPLE do not have >>any respect for human lives or civil laws where non-Jews are concerned. >> >>If you don't see anything wrong with EIGHT soldiers walking up to a naked >>man, bound and gaged and firing point blank into his head, it is clear why >>antisemites exist. >> >>js > > > This is such a fine example of Jack's antisemitic bigotry that I >couldn't help but do a follow-up. > > A poster attempts to discuss an event rationally, with no indication >at all that he is identified with any specific ethnic group - he is merely >talking in terms that might apply to ANY group in similar circumstances. > > Schmidling comes back with a rabid attack against YOU PEOPLE, as if >it were crystal clear that the Jewish people as a whole were culpable for this >man's statements - even if he were not Jewish. Jack considers the Jewish people >to be responsible for all the acts of the supporters of Israel, irrespective of >their age, religion, gender, skin color, or sexual orientation. There is nothing crystal clear about YOU PEOPLE other than a term that includes those people defined by the statement that anyone who believes that the behavior is justifiable is a bigoted, racist pig and YOU PEOPLE know who you are.
dift1010@iro.umontreal.ca