Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu misc.headlines:41574 talk.politics.misc:176872 talk.politics.mideast:75374
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ddsw1!not-for-mail
From: arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling)
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast
Subject: Re: NEWS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED, Mar 29
Message-ID: <1pqskq$jt2@genesis.MCS.COM>
Date: 5 Apr 93 17:15:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: genesis.1pqskq$jt2
References: <1p7b51$smg@genesis.MCS.COM> <1993Apr1.214856.5339@Rapnet.Sanders.Lockheed.Com> <1pkl2n$kka@genesis.MCS.COM> <1937@tecsun1.tec.army.mil>
Organization: MCSNet Contributor, Chicago, IL
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.mcs.com
In article <1937@tecsun1.tec.army.mil> riggs@descartes.etl.army.mil (Bill Riggs) writes:
>In article <1pkl2n$kka@genesis.MCS.COM> arf@genesis.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes:
>>In article <1993Apr1.214856.5339@Rapnet.Sanders.Lockheed.Com> babb@k2 (Scott Babb) writes:
>>>Jack Schmidling (arf@genesis.MCS.COM) wrote:
>>>
>>>: >An Israeli soldier, stabbed in the neck, was lightly injured. Soldiers
>>>: opened fire when a 19-year-old Gazan standing among visitors to the jail
>>>: stabbed the soldier, who pushed the attacker away. Witnesses said up to
>>>: eight soldiers fired at the man and he was hit repeatedly in the head.
>>>
>>>A soldier is attacked and his attacker is killed. What is the problem
>>>here? Would your opinion be any different if the soldiers wounds were
>>>more severe? How about if his attacker was only crippled for life,
>>>instead of being killed? I suspect that any Army would reprimand
>>>soldiers who shot to injure, rather than kill. Another lesson here:
>>
>>You are really sick, my friend. The problem is that YOU PEOPLE do not have
>>any respect for human lives or civil laws where non-Jews are concerned.
>>
>>If you don't see anything wrong with EIGHT soldiers walking up to a naked
>>man, bound and gaged and firing point blank into his head, it is clear why
>>antisemites exist.
>>
>>js
>
>
> This is such a fine example of Jack's antisemitic bigotry that I
>couldn't help but do a follow-up.
>
> A poster attempts to discuss an event rationally, with no indication
>at all that he is identified with any specific ethnic group - he is merely
>talking in terms that might apply to ANY group in similar circumstances.
>
> Schmidling comes back with a rabid attack against YOU PEOPLE, as if
>it were crystal clear that the Jewish people as a whole were culpable for this
>man's statements - even if he were not Jewish. Jack considers the Jewish people
>to be responsible for all the acts of the supporters of Israel, irrespective of
>their age, religion, gender, skin color, or sexual orientation.
There is nothing crystal clear about YOU PEOPLE other than a term
that includes those people defined by the statement that anyone who
believes that the behavior is justifiable is a bigoted, racist pig and
YOU PEOPLE know who you are.
dift1010@iro.umontreal.ca