aller au debut du message document suivant

Newsgroups: rec.autos Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!headwall.Stanford.EDU!nntp.Stanford.EDU!tedebear From: tedebear@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen) Subject: Re: Are BMW's worth the price? Message-ID: <1993Apr5.183248.25040@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA References: <1993Apr5.135153.11132@wdl.loral.com> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 93 18:32:48 GMT In article <1993Apr5.135153.11132@wdl.loral.com> gwm@spl1.spl.loral.com (Gary W. Mahan) writes: >Road and Track (2/88) BMW325is 0-60 7.5s, 1/4 mile 15.7s > (Road Test > Annual 1993) 0-60 8.3s, 1/4 mile 16.2s > > >Those are the numbers I was quoting, I have driven the older model but not the >newer. sure sounds like they got a ringer. the 325is i drove was definitely faster than that. if you want to quote numbers, my AW AutoFile shows 0-60 in 7.4, 1/4 mile in 15.9. it quotes Car and Driver's figures of 6.9 and 15.3. oh, BTW, these numbers are for the 325i. i don't know how the addition of variable valve timing for 1993 affects it. but don't take my word for it. go drive it. -teddy
dift1010@iro.umontreal.ca